Comparison of the Effect of Direct Breastfeeding, Expressed Human Milk, and Infant Formula Feeding on Infant Weight Trajectories: A Systematic Review.

Background: Formula and breastfeeding are known factors associated with infant weight trajectories. Evidence exploring the effect of expressed human milk feeding on infant weight in the community setting has not been well synthesized. Objectives: This systematic review examined (1) weight changes among infants fed expressed human milk and (2) differences in weight change between infants fed expressed human milk and infants fed at the breast or infant formula via bottle. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The quality of each study was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tools. Results: A total of six studies met the eligibility criteria and included a total of 5,152 infants. The within-subject analysis identified only 31 infants strictly or predominantly fed expressed human milk. The between-subject analysis comparing expressed human milk feeding to the available comparison groups (formula-fed or direct at the breastfed) revealed that higher weight gains were observed in the weight trajectories among infants in the bottle or formula-fed conditions in four of the six included studies. Conclusions: Findings from the few studies included in this review found a difference in the infant weight gain patterns among expressed human milk-fed infants when compared with their respective feeding groups (directly breastfed or formula-fed). Further research is needed to corroborate these findings and elucidate the clinical significance of the differences in weight gain patterns observed across infant feeding groups.

Mothers' Experiences with Antenatal Milk Expression.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal milk expression is a milk expression intervention beginning at either 36 or 37 weeks of gestation for the purpose of potential colostrum collection and storage prior to birth for postnatal infant feeding. Research on antenatal milk expression is limited and originates outside the United States. METHODS: Women who used antenatal milk expression were interviewed about their experiences. A conventional, inductive approach to qualitative content analysis was used to analyze participants' responses. RESULTS: Three women participated in interviews. They reported learning and performing antenatal milk expression for various postpartum needs including avoidance of formula, milk available for potential infant hypoglycemia, and to support human milk feeding during surrogate mother-infant separation. These mothers obtained education and information on antenatal milk expression primarily on their own. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Greater awareness and understanding of antenatal milk expression is needed in the professional community caring for childbearing women. Perinatal nurses need to be aware of all breastfeeding practices including antenatal milk expression. Knowledge of the practice and advocacy for more research on antenatal milk expression will improve lactation support and ensure expectant mothers reach their personal breastfeeding goals.

Integrative Review of Antenatal Milk Expression and Mother-Infant Outcomes During the First 2 Weeks After Birth.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the practice of antenatal milk expression (AME) and related outcomes for mother-infant dyads during the first 2 weeks after birth. DATA SOURCES: We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Emcare, Maternity & Infant Care Database, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant literature. We also conducted backward reference searches on relevant publications and nondatabase searches after review of the full texts. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported primary studies focused on AME, included samples of mother-infant dyads, and were published in English. We did not impose time or design limitations given the sparse availability of literature on AME. We identified 766 articles. After the removal of duplicates, we screened 588 articles, and of these, we included 15 articles in our review. DATA EXTRACTION: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to guide data extraction and reporting. We evaluated the quality of evidence using the Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt rating system and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. DATA SYNTHESIS: We synthesized data from the included articles into four themes: Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy, Milk Supply, Infant Well-Being, and Infant Feeding Methods. CONCLUSION: AME may support breastfeeding by improving breastfeeding self-efficacy and milk supply and by decreasing early formula use. Synthesized literature on AME shows the safety of the practice and that infants of women who practice AME have a greater likelihood of breastfeeding exclusivity during the short term.

Breastfeeding experiences of same-sex mothers.

BACKGROUND: Family structures are diversifying in the United States, and more same-sex female couples are building families. For two-mother families, complexity exists for breastfeeding as more than one mother can provide human milk. The purpose of this study was to explore the lactation experience and level of lactation support of birth mothers in a same-sex (two female) relationship. METHODS: This study consists of a mixed methods design using an online survey to identify the demographic of same-sex mothers and qualitative interviews to provide an in-depth understanding of the mothers' experiences. Qualitative content analysis is applied to develop themes from the interviews. RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants completed the online survey. Thirty-seven mothers (59%) reported breastfeeding for more than one year. Fourteen (21%) respondents reported accessing induced lactation information for the nongestational parent from their health care practitioner. Forty-three (63%) respondents reported receiving breastfeeding and induced lactation information from other sources. Only nine (13%) nongestational parents underwent induced lactation. Eighteen gestational mothers participated in qualitative interviews. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: (a) committed to a year, (b) deciding "how to do it," (c) sources of information, (d) involvement of partner, and (e) need for inclusive and educated health care practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Same-sex mothers have strong intentions to breastfeed and are resourceful in educating themselves for induced lactation and conursing. Nongestational parents are essential support partners and equivalent in motherhood. Providers need to better equip themselves and incorporate inclusive language in breastfeeding policy statements to support lactation outcomes.

Same-Sex Mothers and Lactation.

Investigation of the needs of same-sex mothers practicing lactation is limited in the nursing literature. The heteronormative structure of the healthcare system has stigmatized these postpartum women and minimized the level of nursing care provided. Case reports demonstrate that same-sex mothers value inclusivity and understanding of their healthcare needs that is missing in healthcare settings. Perinatal nurses must listen attentively and think critically about their words and actions to avoid inappropriate judgments when providing care to this population. Active engagement and ongoing competence education builds the foundation that will provide perinatal nurses the knowledge they need to best support the unique needs of same-sex mothers in their lactation experience.